Brown v. Wright

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Brown v. Wright

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION BYRON BROWN PLAINTIFF v. No: 4:21-cv-00570-JM

RODNEY WRIGHT, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff Byron Brown filed a pro se complaint, pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

, on June 24, 2021 (Doc. No. 1). On June 25, 2021, the Court entered an order directing Brown to submit the full $402.00 filing and administrative fees or file a fully completed in forma pauperis application within 30 days. See Doc. No. 2. Brown was cautioned that failure to comply with the Court’s order within that time would result in the dismissal of his case. More than 30 days have passed, and Brown has not complied or otherwise responded to the June 25 order. Accordingly, the Court finds that this action should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) and failure to respond to the Court’s orders. See Miller v. Benson,

51 F.3d 166, 168

(8th Cir. 1995) (District courts have inherent power to dismiss sua sponte a case for failure to prosecute, and exercise of that power is reviewed for abuse of discretion). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Brown’s complaint (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DATED this 5" day of August, 2021.

UNITED S itis teh JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown