Hooker v. Wright

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

CENTRAL DIVISION

RUSSELL HOOKER PLAINTIFF v. No: 4:21-cv-00544-JM

RODNEY WRIGHT, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER

Plaintiff Russell Hooker filed a pro se complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, on June 21, 2021 (Doc. No. 1). On July 12, 2021, the Court entered an order directing Hooker to file an amended complaint clarifying his claims within 30 days. See Doc. No. 6. Hooker was cautioned that failure to comply with the Court’s order within that time would result in the dismissal of his case.

More than 30 days have passed, and Hooker has not complied or otherwise responded to the July 12 order. Accordingly, the Court finds that this action should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) and failure to respond to the Court’s orders. See Miller v. Benson, 51 F.3d 166, 168 (8th Cir. 1995) (District courts have inherent power to dismiss sua sponte a case for failure to prosecute, and exercise of that power is reviewed for abuse of discretion).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Hooker’s complaint (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

DATED this 19th day of August, 2021.

Qe