Pilgreen v. Intimidator Inc

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Pilgreen v. Intimidator Inc

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION

ROSS PILGREEN PLAINTIFF

v. No. 3:20-cv-144-DPM

INTIMIDATOR, INC., and INTIMIDATOR SPECIAL VEHICLES TEAM, LLC DEFENDANTS

ORDER The joint motion to approve the settlement, Doc. 26, is granted. The proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. Lynn’s food Stores, Inc. v. United States,

679 F.2d 1350

, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Barbee v. Big River Steel, LLC,

927 F.3d 1024

, 1027 n.1 (8th Cir. 2019); Melgar v. OK Foods,

902 F.3d 775, 779

(8th Cir. 2018). It reflects a good-faith compromise of contested overtime compensation issues. And the attorney’s fee was negotiated separately, after the parties had settled the wage claims. Compare Doc. 26 at { 8, with Vines v. Welspun Pipes Inc.,

2021 WL 3640219

(8th Cir. 18 August 2021). The Court will dismiss Pilgreen’s complaint with prejudice. So Ordered. _ NIV G4 Mol D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge le Seatem ser 20A|

Reference

Status
Unknown