United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, 2021

Hanlin v. Pulaski County Jail

Hanlin v. Pulaski County Jail
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas · Decided November 5, 2021
Hanlin v. Pulaski County Jail

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

CENTRAL DIVISION

PAUL EUGENE HANLIN PLAINTIFF ADC #127222

V. No. 4:21-CV-00833-LPR-JTR

PULASKI COUNTY JAIL, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER

On September 17, 2021, Paul Eugene Hanlin (“Plaintiff”), an inmate in the Pulaski County Detention Center, filed a pro se Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 2).

On September 21, 2021, the Court entered an Order in which it directed Plaintiff, by October 21, 2021, to either: (1) pay the $402 filing and administrative fee; or (2) complete and sign the in forma pauperis application, have an authorized prison official complete and sign the trust fund account certificate and calculation sheet, and return all forms to the Clerk. (Doc. 3 at 3). The Court warned Plaintiff that his failure to comply with the Order would cause his Complaint to be dismissed. (/d.). Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the September 21, 2021 Order, and the time for doing so has passed.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) and Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962) (district courts have power to dismiss sua sponte under Rule 41(b)). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis appeal from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of November, 2021.

LEE P. RUDOFSKY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.