Foster v. Rick Shipman Construction Inc

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

NORTHERN DIVISION

TERRY FOSTER PLAINTIFF v. CASE NO. 3:20-CV-00135-BSM

RICK SHIPMAN

CONSTRUCTION, INC. DEFENDANT ORDER

Terry Foster’s motion to reconsider or amend judgment [Doc. No. 36] is denied. See United States v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer Dist., 440 F.3d 930, 933 (8th Cir. 2006)(“[a] district court has broad discretion in determining whether to grant or deny a motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e)”). Rule 59(e) motions function to correct “manifest errors of law or fact” and cannot be used to tender new legal theories. Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corp., 839 F.2d 407, 414 (8th Cir. 1988).

IT IS SO ORDERED this Ist day of December, 2021.

Brrer— A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE