IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION TERRY FOSTER PLAINTIFF

v. CASE NO. 3:20-CV-00135-BSM RICK SHIPMAN CONSTRUCTION, INC. DEFENDANT ORDER Terry Foster’s motion to reconsider or amend judgment [Doc. No. 36] is denied. See United States v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer Dist.,

(8th Cir. 2006)(“[a] district court has broad discretion in determining whether to grant or deny a motion to alter

or amend judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e)”). Rule 59(e) motions function to correct “manifest errors of law or fact” and cannot be used to tender new legal theories. Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corp.,

(8th Cir. 1988). IT IS SO ORDERED this Ist day of December, 2021.

Brrer— A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE