Kantaris v. Hendrix
Kantaris v. Hendrix
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION ROBERT LEE KANTARIS PETITIONER Reg. #16762-029 V. No. 4:20-CV-01521-BSM-JTR DWAYNE HENDRIX, Warden, FCI-Forrest City Low RESPONDENT ORDER Robert Lee Kantaris’s petition [Doc. No. 1] is dismissed without prejudice because there is no subject matter jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. section 2241to consider Kantaris’s request for compassionate release. See
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A); Claassen v. Hendrix, No. 2:20-cv-107-BSM/JTR,
2020 WL 4342606, at *1 (E.D. Ark. June 15, 2020), report and recommendation adopted, No. 2:20-cv-107-BSM,
2020 WL 4342445(E.D. Ark. July 28, 2020); see also Smoke v. United States, No. CIV. 09-2050,
2009 WL 5030770, at *4 (D. Minn. Dec. 14, 2009) (a request for compassionate release must be filed as a motion under
18 U.S.C. § 3582in the district court that imposed the sentence). IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of December, 2021. (Biron oy WIV UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown