Holder v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company

United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas

Holder v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company

Trial Court Opinion

IN TWHEES UTENRITNE DDI SSTTARITCETS ODFIS ATRRKICATN CSOAUS RT TEXARKANA DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER HOLDER PLAINTIFF

v. Case No. 4:20-cv-4022

COOPER TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY DEFENDANT

ORDER Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal. ECF No. 16. The parties stipulate that this case should be dismissed with prejudice. An action may be dismissed by “a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). “Caselaw concerning stipulated dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is clear that the entry of such a stipulation of dismissal is effective automatically and does not require judicial approval.” Gardiner v. A.H. Robins Co.,

747 F.2d 1180, 1189

(8th Cir. 1984). The instant stipulation of dismissal is signed by Plaintiff and Defendant. Thus, Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant were effectively dismissed when the parties filed the instant stipulation. However, this order issues for purposes of maintaining the docket. Accordingly, this case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each side bearing their own fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 9th day of February, 2021. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey Chief United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown