IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMIH DIVISION

TRACIE NICHOLS PLAINTIFF

vs. Civil No. 2:20-cv-02077

ANDREW SAUL DEFENDANT Commissioner, Social Security Administration

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court is Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Remand. ECF No. 25. Plaintiff has no objections to this Motion. Pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(1) and (3) (2009), the Honorable P. K. Holmes, III referred this case to this Court for the purpose of making a report and recommendation. In accordance with that referral, this Court enters the following report and recommendation. Defendant requests Plaintiff’s case be remanded pursuant to Sentence Four of

(g) so the Commissioner can conduct further proceedings. ECF No. 25. Specifically, Defendant requests ALJ to consider the medical opinions from Drs. Dunaway and Williams; further consider the claimant’s subjectively reported symptoms pursuant to 20 CFR 404.1529, 416.929, and Social Security Ruling 16-3p; further consider the claimant’s residual functional capacity; offer the claimant the opportunity for a hearing, take any further action needed to complete the administrative record, and issue a new decision. Based upon the foregoing, this Court recommends Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Remand (ECF No. 25) be GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s case be reversed and remanded to the Social Security Administration for further administrative review pursuant to Sentence Four of

(g).

The Parties have fourteen (14) days from receipt of this Report and Recommendation in which to file written objections pursuant to

(b)(1). The failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. The Parties are reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the district court. See Thompson v. Nix,

(8th Cir. 1990). ENTERED this 13th day of April 2021.

Barry A. Bryant /s/ HON. BARRY A. BRYANT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE