Linley v. Kholor

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

EL DORADO DIVISION

MARK LINLEY and

KATHY LINLEY PLAINTIFFS v. Case No. 1:20-cv-1018

AZIMDZHON KHOLOR and

ANNETT HOLDINGS, INC. d/b/a TMC DEFENDANTS ORDER

Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal without Prejudice. (ECF No. 17). The Court finds the matter ripe for consideration.

An action may be dismissed by “a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). “Caselaw concerning stipulated dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is clear that the entry of such a stipulation of dismissal is effective automatically and does not require judicial approval.” Gardiner v. A.H. Robins Co., 747 F.2d 1180, 1189 (8th Cir. 1984). Thus, Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendants were effectively dismissed when the parties filed the instant stipulation. However, this order issues for the purpose of maintaining the Court’s docket. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendants are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 26th day of April, 2021. /s/ Susan O. Hickey

Susan O. Hickey

Chief United States District Judge