IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTVILLE DIVISION

LAUREN A. SUGGS PLAINTIFF

vs. Civil No. 5:20-cv-05121

ANDREW SAUL DEFENDANT Commissioner, Social Security Administration

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court is Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Reverse and Remand. ECF No. 20. Plaintiff has no objections to this Motion. Pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(1) and (3) (2009), the Honorable Timothy L. Brooks referred this case to this Court for the purpose of making a report and recommendation. In accordance with that referral, this Court enters the following report and recommendation. Defendant requests Plaintiff’s case be remanded pursuant to Sentence Four of

(g) so the Commissioner can conduct further proceedings. ECF No. 20. Plaintiff has no objections to this Motion.

Based upon the foregoing, this Court recommends Defendant’s Motion to Reverse and Remand (ECF No. 20) be GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s case be reversed and remanded to the Social Security Administration for further administrative review pursuant to Sentence Four of

(g). Further, this Court recommends that if Plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney's fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA),

, an application may be filed up to thirty (30) days after the judgment becomes “not appealable” (i.e., thirty (30) days after the sixty (60) day time for appeal has ended). See Shalala v. Schaefer,

,

(1993);

(d)(1)(B),(d)(2)(G). The Parties have fourteen (14) days from receipt of this Report and Recommendation in which to file written objections pursuant to

(b)(1). The failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. The Parties are reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the district court. See Thompson v. Nix,

(8th Cir. 1990).

ENTERED this 13th day of May 2021. Barry A. Bryant /s/ HON. BARRY A. BRYANT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE