IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION

LISA MURPHY PLAINTIFF ADC #760343

V. Case No. 3:21-cv-00141-LPR

PAYNE, Director, ADC, et al. DEFENDANTS

ORDER

On July 26, 2021, Plaintiff Lisa Murphy (“Plaintiff”), an inmate in the Arkansas Division of Correction (“ADC”), filed a pro se Complaint pursuant to

. (Doc. 2). On November 19, 2021, the Court entered an Initial Order for Pro Se Prisoners that, among other things: (1) informed Plaintiff of her obligation to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2); and (2) directed that Plaintiff, no later than December 20, 2021, either submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $402 filing fee in full. Doc. 5. Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the November 19, 2021 Order, and the time for doing so has passed.1 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) and Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Link v. Wabash R.R. Co.,

, 630–31 (1962) (district courts have power to dismiss sua sponte under Rule 41(b)). The Court certifies pursuant to

(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis appeal from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith.

1 The ADC’s online inmate roster no longer lists Plaintiff as an ADC inmate. ADC Inmate Search, https://apps.ark.org/inmate_info/search.php (last visited Dec. 21, 2021). Under Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), it is Plaintiff’s responsibility to promptly notify the Court of an address change. She has not done so. IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of January, 2022.

LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE