Toepfer v. Reynolds

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Toepfer v. Reynolds

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION

NICKOLUS G. TOEPFER PLAINTIFF

V. No. 3:20-CV-150-LPR-JTR

PHIL REYNOLDS, Sheriff, Woodruff County; and JIM DUNHAM, Chief Deputy DEFENDANTS

ORDER On March 4, 2022, the Court denied Plaintiff Nickolus Toepfer’s third and fourth Motions to Appoint Counsel. Doc. 56. In doing so, the Court carefully considered Toepfer’s allegations of “memory loss” and “brain damage,” and analyzed his request for counsel under the relevant factors.1 On March 25, 2022, Toepfer filed a “Motion to Remedy Counsel” (Doc. 57) along with Responses to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 59) and Statement of Indisputable Material Fact (Doc. 58). In the Motion to Remedy Counsel, which the Court construes as a fifth Motion to Appoint Counsel, Toepfer again alleges that he suffers from memory loss and “several other mental deficit issues.” Doc. 57 at 2. He also states that he has not had access to the law library for the past month. Doc. 57 at 3.

1 See Phillips v. Jasper Cty. Jail,

437 F.3d 791, 794

(8th. Cir. 2006). Toepfer has provided no reason or basis for the Court to reconsider its prior ruling regarding appointment of counsel. Accordingly, Plaintiffs fifth Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 57) is DENIED. However, given Toepfer’s lack of access to the law library, he will have until April 29, 2022 to submit a Supplemental Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Toepfer is again reminded that, at the summary judgment stage, a plaintiff cannot rest upon mere allegations and, instead, must meet proof with proof. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e). This means that his Supplemental Response should include legal arguments, as well as affidavits,” prison records, or other evidence establishing that there is a genuine issue of material fact that must be resolved at a hearing or trial. SO ORDERED, this 28th day of March, 2022.

Wrenn! as

2 The affidavit must be based upon the personal knowledge of the person executing the affidavit and must be either: (1) sworn and subscribed to by a notary public; or (2) executed under penalty of perjury, as provided for by

28 U.S.C. § 1746

.

Reference

Status
Unknown