Webster v. Talley

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Webster v. Talley

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION GARY LEON WEBSTER PLAINTIFF ADC #114018 v. CASE NO. 3:22-CV-00088-BSM DAVID TALLEY DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff Gary Webster’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. No. 1] is denied, and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) provides that a prisoner cannot proceed

in forma pauperis “if the prisoner has on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical

injury.”

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(g). Prior to filing this lawsuit on March 29, 2022, Webster filed at least three actions that were dismissed for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Webster v. Does, 3:19-CV-00059 DPM (E.D. Ark.); Webster v. Pigg, 3:19-CV-00060 DPM (E.D. Ark.); and Webster v. Day Inn Motels, Inc., et al., 3:19-CV-00078 DPM (E.D. Ark.).

Nevertheless, Mr. Webster may proceed in forma pauperis if he falls under the “imminent danger” exception to the three strikes rule. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(g) (providing that three strikers should be granted permission to proceed in forma pauperis if they are “under imminent danger of serious physical injury”); Ashley v. Dilworth,

147 F.3d 715, 717

(8th Cir. 1998) (explaining that the exception applies only if the prisoner is in imminent danger “at the time of filing” and that “[a]llegations that the prisoner has faced imminent danger in the past are insufficient’). Webster asserts that defendant wrote a fraudulent article about him. This allegation does not indicate that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. Thus, it would be futile to direct Webster to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons stated above, this case is dismissed due to Webster’s failure to pay the filing fee. Webster will have thirty (30) days to reopen this case by paying the $402 filing fee in full. It is certified, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. section 1915

(a)(3), an in forma pauperis appeal from this order or the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of April, 2022.

Rarer YX a UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown