IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION

HOUSTON L. HAMILTON #37847 PLAINTIFF

V. NO. 3:21-cv-00184-BRW-ERE

SUSAN COX DEFENDANT

ORDER

Defendant Susan Cox has filed a motion for summary judgment, brief in support, and statement of facts arguing she is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the merits of Mr. Hamilton’s claims. Docs. 35, 36, 37. Mr. Hamilton has a right to file a response. At the summary judgment stage, a plaintiff cannot rest upon mere allegations and, instead, must meet proof with proof. See FED. R. CIV. P. 56(e). This means that Mr. Hamilton’s response should include his legal arguments, as well as affidavits,1 jail records, or other evidence to show that there is a genuine issue of material fact that must be resolved at a hearing or trial.

1 The affidavit must be either: (1) sworn and subscribed to by a notary public; or (2) executed under penalty of perjury, as provided for by 28 U.S.C. ' 1746. Additionally, the affidavit must be based upon the personal knowledge of the person executing the affidavit. The Court may not consider an affidavit unless it meets these requirements. In addition, pursuant to Local Rule 56.1,2 Mr. Hamilton must separately file a “separate, short and concise statement of the material facts as to which [he] contends

there is no genuine dispute to be tried.” Mr. Hamilton’s statement of disputed facts must state whether he “agrees” or “disagrees” with the factual statements in each of the numbered paragraphs in Defendant Cox’s statement of undisputed facts. Doc.

36. If Mr. Hamilton disagrees with any of the facts in Defendant Cox’s statement of undisputed facts, he must: (1) identify each numbered paragraph that contains the facts he disputes; (2) for each paragraph, explain why he disputes those facts; and (3) include a citation to the evidence he is relying on to support his version of the

disputed fact. If Mr. Hamilton relies on documents that have been previously filed in the record, he must specifically refer to those documents by docket number and page. The Court will not sift through the file to find support for Mr. Hamilton’s

factual contentions. See Crossley v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.,

(8th Cir. 2004) (affirming the grant of summary judgment because a plaintiff failed to properly refer to specific pages of the record that supported his position). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. Mr. Hamilton has until and including July 14, 2022, to file: (1) a response to Defendant Cox’s motion for summary judgment; and (2) a separate

2 The Local Rules for the Eastern District of Arkansas are available on the internet. See https://www.are.uscourts.gov/court-info/local-rules-and-orders/local-rules. statement of disputed facts. As to any filing, Mr. Hamilton should attempt to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, Local Rule 56.1, and the instructions in this Order. 2. Mr. Hamilton is advised that the failure to timely and properly file a

response and statement of disputed facts may result in: (1) all of the facts in Defendant Cox’s statement of undisputed facts being deemed admitted, pursuant to Local Rule 56.1(c); and (2) the possible dismissal of this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Dated this 23rd day of June, 2022.

M ZlyV_. LNA