Bolden v. Reynolds

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION CARSON DeWAYNE BOLDEN, JR. PLAINTIFF v. Case No: 3:22-cv-00202 BRW PHIL REYNOLDS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER On August 31, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge Patricia Harris entered an order informing Mr. Bolden that he must file an amended complaint within 30 days.1 Mr. Bolden was warned that his complaint may be dismissed if he did not file an amended complaint. Mr. Bolden filed a notice that his address had changed on September 7, 2022, and the Court’s August 31 order was sent to him at his new address. It has been over 30 days since Mr. Bolden was directed to file an amended complaint, and he has not done so. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), failure to respond to court orders, and for failure to prosecute.2 IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of October, 2022.

______B_I_L_L_Y_ _R_O__Y_ _W__IL_S__O_N___________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Doc. No. 9.

2 See Miller v. Benson, 51 F.3d 166, 168 (8th Cir. 1995) (District courts have inherent power to dismiss sua sponte a case for failure to prosecute, and exercise of that power is reviewed for abuse of discretion).