Taylor v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company

United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas

Taylor v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company

Trial Court Opinion

WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

MARY JANE TAYLOR, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Willie M. Taylor, Deceased PLAINTIFF

v. Case No. 4:19-cv-4129

KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY DEFENDANT

ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Notice of Dismissal With Prejudice. (ECF No. 46). The parties have settled this case and stipulate to its dismissal with prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs. An action may be dismissed by “a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The instant stipulation of dismissal does not have both parties’ signatures, so the Court will construe it as a motion to voluntarily dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), which allows for the dismissal of a case by court order at the plaintiff’s request, on terms the court considers proper. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). “Voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2) should not be granted if a party will be prejudiced by the dismissal.” Adams v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.,

863 F.3d 1069, 1079

(8th Cir. 2017). The Court sees no reason why either party would be prejudiced by their requested dismissal, so good cause exists for the motion. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 46) is hereby GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party bearing its own costs. If any party desires that the terms of settlement be a part of the record therein, those terms should be reduced to writing and filed with the Court within thirty (30) days of the entry of this judgment. The Court retains jurisdiction to vacate this order and to reopen this action upon cause shown that the settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 5th day of April, 2022. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey

Reference

Status
Unknown