Mashburn v. Master Mobilelink LLC
Mashburn v. Master Mobilelink LLC
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION
SHANNON MASHBURN PLAINTIFF
No. 4:21-cv-412-DPM
MASTER MOBILELINK, LLC DEFENDANTS ORDER 1. The joint motion, Doc. 20, is granted. The proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States,
679 F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Barbee v. Big River Steel, LLC,
927 F.3d 1024, 2027(8th Cir. 2019); Melgar v. OK Foods,
902 F.3d 775, 779(8th Cir. 2018). It reflects a good-faith compromise of the parties’ wage-related dispute. The Court applauds the bullet-point listing of the legal sources of all the released claims. Doc. 21 at 3. This way of listing promotes clarity. And the attorney’s fee, though allocated in the settlement agreement, was negotiated separately. The Court will dismiss the complaint with prejudice and retain jurisdiction for a time to enforce the settlement. 2. The embedded motion to withdraw the motion to enforce settlement, Doc. 18, is granted. Doc. 18 is withdrawn without prejudice.
So Ordered.
SPrarvstoll □□□ D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge -_ 4 Pay 20S
ihe
Reference
- Status
- Unknown