Anderson v. Davison
Anderson v. Davison
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
CLARENCE ANDERSON PLAINTIFF
V. No. 3:22-CV-160-BRW
DAVISON, Police Officer, Trumann Police Department; TYLER ROBINSON, Police Officer, Trumann Police Department; CAGEL, Sergeant, Trumann Police Department; and RON HUNTER, District Judge, Poinsett County DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has received a Recommendation for dismissal from Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has now passed. After careful review of the Recommendation and the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in its entirety. Anderson’s Complaint (Doc. 2) is DISMISSED, without prejudice. The Court recommends that the dismissal count as a “strike” for the purposes of the Prison Litigation Reform Act.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); see Gonzalez v. United States,
23 F.4th 788, 789(8th Cir.), cert. denied,
142 S. Ct. 2837(2022). The Court certifies, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting this Recommendation would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of June, 2023.
________B__IL__L_Y_ _R_O__Y_ _W__IL_S__O_N__________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown