Stevens v. West

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Stevens v. West

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION

TONY JOE STEVENS, ADC #40485 PLAINTIFF

V. NO. 3:22-CV-292-DPM-ERE

ZACHARY WEST, et al DEFENDANTS

ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Tony Joe Stevens’ motion for appointed counsel. Doc. 20. For reasons that follow, the motion is denied without prejudice. A pro se litigant in a civil case does not have a statutory or constitutional right to appointed counsel. Patterson v. Kelley,

902 F.3d 845, 850

(8th Cir. 2018); Phillips v. Jasper County Jail,

437 F.3d 791, 794

(8th Cir. 2006). However, the Court may, in its discretion, appoint counsel if the pro se prisoner has stated a non-frivolous claim and “the nature of the litigation is such that plaintiff as well as the court will benefit from the assistance of counsel.” Patterson,

902 F.3d at 850

(quoting Johnson v. Williams,

788 F.2d 1319, 1322

(8th Cir. 1986)). In making this determination, the Court must weigh and consider the following factors: (1) the factual and legal complexity of the case; (2) the plaintiff’s ability to investigate the facts; (3) the existence of conflicting testimony; and (4) the plaintiff’s ability to present his claims. Id.; Phillips,

437 F.3d at 794

. The decision to appoint counsel is based on the circumstances of each case. After considering all relevant factors, in particular, the factual and legal complexity of this case, the Court declines to appoint counsel at this point in the case.! IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Mr. Stevens’ motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. 20) is DENIED, without prejudice. So Ordered 7 July 2023.

ZM_. CEMA

' As the case proceeds, the Court will reconsider, on its own, whether counsel should be appointed to assist Mr. Stevens. And if the case is scheduled for trial, the Court will likely appoint counsel to assist Mr. Stevens.

Reference

Status
Unknown