IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DIVISION OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION DOMINIQUE SINCLAIR PLAINTIFF V. No. 3:23-CV-00219-BRW ANTHONY DAVIS, ET AL. DEFENDANTS ORDER A district court has the authority to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to state a claim.1 Plaintiff’s complaint asserts claims for breaking & entering, false imprisonment, attempted murder, bodily intrusion, and forgery based on Defendants’ alleged “proton therapy” which put her “at risk of death.”2 She seeks $15 billion in damages. Because Plaintiff’s complaint is nonsensical, frivolous, and states no cause of action

against Defendant for which relief may be granted, this case is DISMISSED. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 1) is MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of October, 2023.

Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1See Smith v. Boyd,

(8th Cir. 1991). 2Doc. No. 2.