Addison v. Frito-Lay Inc

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Addison v. Frito-Lay Inc

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION

JAMES ADDISON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated PLAINTIFF

V. No. 3:22-cv-314-DPM

FRITO-LAY INC. DEFENDANT

ORDER Joint motion, Doc. 16, noted. The request to keep the settlement agreement confidential is denied. While the parties’ preference for confidentiality is understandable, the Court’s practice in FLSA cases is for the agreement to be on the public docket. Doc. 70 in Delock v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., Case No. 4:11-cv-520-DPM (E.D. Ark. 16 November 2012); Doc. 27 in McMechen v. Blackboard, Inc., Case No. 3:18-cv-218-DPM (E.D. Ark. 19 December 2019). If this is a deal breaker, the parties should so advise the Court and the trial date will be restored. If it is not, please file the settlement agreement on the public docket. And please advise about whether the attorney's fee was negotiated separately from the merits, as required. Barbee v. Big River Steel, LLC,

927 F.3d 1024

, 1027 n.1 (8th Cir. 2019); Melgar v. OK Foods,

902 F.3d 775, 779

(8th Cir. 2018). Joint report and settlement agreement (or not) due by 15 December 2023.

So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge AF Nevemby 2023

2.

Reference

Status
Unknown