Winfrey v. Social Security Administration

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Winfrey v. Social Security Administration

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION TONY WILLIAM WINFREY PLAINTIFF

V. No. 4:23-CV-00629-BBM

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner Social Security Administration DEFENDANT

ORDER Plaintiff Tony William Winfrey filed the above-captioned case, seeking judicial review of the administrative denial of his applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. (Doc. 2). On December 11, 2023, the Defendant filed an Unopposed Motion to Reverse and Remand for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of

42 U.S.C. § 405

(g). (Doc. 16). The Motion in unopposed. Jd. For good cause shown, the motion will be granted. Accordingly, the Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Reverse and Remand (Doc. 16) is GRANTED. The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this matter is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings. This is a “sentence four” remand within the meaning of

42 U.S.C. § 405

(g) and Melkonyan v. Sullivan,

501 U.S. 89

(1991). SO ORDERED this 11th day of December, 2023.

‘2 nee a WWE. TED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown