Harrison v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Harrison v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:23-cv-02052-CDC Document 15 Filed 09/06/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1631
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMTH DIVISION
KENNETH E. HARRISON PLAINTIFF
v. CIVIL NO. 23-2052
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner Social Security Administration DEFENDANT
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff, Kenneth E. Harrison, brings this action pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking
judicial review of a decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
(Commissioner) denying his application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits
(DIB) under the provisions of Title II of the Social Security Act (Act). (ECF No. 3). The Defendant
filed an Answer to Plaintiff's action on June 12, 2023. (ECF No. 7).
On September 6, 2023, the Commissioner filed an unopposed motion to remand Plaintiff's
case pursuant to "sentence four" of section 405(g) in order to conduct further administrative
proceedings. (ECF No. 13).
The exclusive methods by which a district court may remand a social security case to the
Commissioner are set forth in "sentence four" and "sentence six" of
42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A remand
pursuant to "sentence six" is limited to two situations: where the Commissioner requests a remand
before answering the complaint, or where the court orders the Commissioner to consider new,
material evidence that was for good cause not presented before the agency. The fourth sentence
of the statute provides that "[t]he court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript
of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of
1 Case 2:23-cv-02052-CDC Document 15 Filed 09/06/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1632
Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing."
42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Shalala
v. Schaefer,
509 U.S. 292, 296(1993).
Based on the foregoing, the Court finds appropriate remand for further administrative
action pursuant to "sentence four" of section 405(g).
DATED this 6th day of September 2023.
/s/_________________________________ HON. CHRISTY COMSTOCK UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown