IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION

WADE WISEMAN PLAINTIFF

No. 3:24-cv-161-DPM

DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON DEFENDANTS

ORDER 1. Certificate of service, Doc. 8, appreciated. 2. Unopposed motion, Doc. 3, granted as modified. Wiseman’s complaint fails to allege enough facts to state a claim against Johnson & Johnson, Depuy’s parent. Epps v. Stewart Information Services Corp.,

(8th Cir. 2003). The modification: This dismissal is without prejudice because Wiseman may be able to allege specific facts showing Johnson & Johnson’s involvement or responsibility. So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge __ 28 frmvary 2025"