Koontz v. Payne
Koontz v. Payne
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS DELTA DIVISION
MORRIS B. KOONTZ ADC #115260 PLAINTIFF
v. No. 2:24-cv-54-DPM-JJV
DEXTER PAYNE, Director, ADC; WILLIAM STRAUGHN, Deputy Director, ADC; MOSES JACKSON, Warden, EARU, ADC; MICHAEL RICHARDSON, Warden, EARU Max Unit, ADC; M. DALE REED, Deputy Director, ADC; and CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, Deputy Warden, EARU, ADC DEFENDANTS
ORDER On de novo review, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Volpe’s partial recommendation, Doc. 76, and overrules Koontz’s objections, Doc. 77. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Magistrate Judge Volpe has done yeoman’s work sorting things out. The ADC has met its burden of showing that Koontz, with one exception, failed to exhaust his claims against Warden Richardson. Foulk v. Charrier,
262 F.3d 687, 697(8th Cir. 2001). Warden Richardson’s motion for partial summary judgment, Doc. 64, is mostly granted, but partly denied. Koontz’s due process claims against Warden Richardson raised in grievance EAM-21-670 go forward. His remaining claims against Warden Richardson are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. Any in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). So Ordered. Pr stoll A D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 29 May 2025
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unknown