United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, 2026

James Lyle Grimmer v. Commissioner Social Security

James Lyle Grimmer v. Commissioner Social Security
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas · Decided January 13, 2026
James Lyle Grimmer v. Commissioner Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION JAMES LYLE GRIMMER PLAINTIFF Case No. 3:25-cv-00051-JTK COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT ORDER Before the Court is the Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees and Expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). (Doc. No. 13) Plaintiff requests a total of $3,198.60. (Doc.

No. 13) Defendant does not object but clarifies Plaintiff improperly classified filing fees as expenses. (Doc. No. 17) After careful consideration, the Court finds that Plaintiff should be awarded reasonable attorney’s fees.

EAJA fees are payable to Plaintiff, not Plaintiff's attorney, and such fees are subject to an offset when the Plaintiff has outstanding federal debts. See Astrue v. Ratliff; 560 U.S. 586, 589 (2010). Therefore, subject to any offset, payment by check to the order of the Plaintiff, in care of his attorney, will issue to Plaintiff's attorney.

Accordingly, the Motion for Attorney’s Fees pursuant to the EAJA (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded $2,793.60 in fees and $405.00 in costs.

SO ORDERED THIS 13th day of January, 2026. □ JEROMET.KEARNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.