Wingfield v. McLure
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Sledge-Norfleet Co. v. Matkins (Ark. 1922)
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Munson (Ark. 1988)
- Twin City Bank v. J. S. McWilliams Auto Co. (Ark. 1931)
- Dale v. Bland (Ark. 1910)
- Knight v. Creswell (Ark. 1907)
- United States v. Taylor (United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas 1907)
- Fuller v. Townsly-Myrick Dry Goods Co. (Ark. 1893)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The judgment recovered by appellees, Geyer, Adams & Co., against appellant for $143, in the Nevada circuit court, at the March term thereof in 1884, is void. Giles v. Hicks, 45 Ark., 271; St. L., 1. M. & S. Ry. v. Richter, ante. 345.
i. invád judgmeDt-
2.Damages upondissolution.
The appellant fails to show in his complaint that he has not a full and adequate remedy at law. Unless he can show that he has not such a remedy, either by appeal, certiorari, application to the court itself which rendered the judgment, or in any other legal and adequate manner, he is not entitled to relief by injunction. The demurrer to the complaint was properly sustained. 1 High on Injunctions, secs. 229, 230; Sanders v. Sanders, 20 Ark., 610; Bell v. Greenwood, 21 Ark., 249; Stillwell v. Oliver, 35 Ark., 187. The court erred in assessing damages on the dissolution ° # 0f the injunction and rendering judgment therefor against appellant. The judgment enjoined being void, no damages were sustained by the stay of proceedings thereon.
The decree of the court below is therefore reversed, and a decree will be entered here in accordance with this opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.