Rana v. State
Rana v. State
51 Ark. 481
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Stern (N.D. 1934)
- Josey v. State (Ark. 1908)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The presumption is that the defendant was the owner of the liquor sold. State v. Devers, 38 Ark., 517.
There was no proof that he sold as the agent of a licensed ■dealer. But this was a matter of defence and the burden was upon the accused. The jury could not rightfully have returned any other verdict upon .the evidence. The instructions could not have prejudiced the accused.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.