Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1889

Boehm v. Botsford

Boehm v. Botsford
Supreme Court of Arkansas · Decided November 15, 1889
52 Ark. 400

Boehm v. Botsford

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

tax Sales. All inquiry as to the validity of the plaintiff's tax title was cut off by the decree of confirmation of the tax sale under which their title was acquired. Wallace v. Brown, 22 Ark., 118; Buckingham v. Hallett, 24 Ark., 519; McCarter v. Neil, 50 ib., 188.

The court adjudged the defendant’s subsequent tax title invalid upon proof which has not been brought upon the record, and we cannot inquire into the correctness of the finding.

Affirm.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.