Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1891

May v. Hutson

Supreme Court of Arkansas · Decided February 21, 1891

54 Ark. 226; 15 S.W. 606; 1891 Ark. LEXIS 38

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Williams v. Swann (Ark. 1952)
LaMode Garment Co. v. Moore & Co. (Ark. 1935)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Amendmentof schedule, The petition for a supesedeas filed by the r * ... appellee is defective in two particulars, viz., it does not state that he is a resident of the State, or that it contains a description of all the defendant’s property, both real and personal. Without the allegations of both facts, it was insufficient to warrant the issuance of a supersedeas. Brown v. Peters, 53 Ark., 182. The petition is subject to amendment. If the facts justify it, both defects may be cured by amendment.

Reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.