Brakefield v. Halpern
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp. (Ark. 1952)
- Ringer v. Virgin Timber Co. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas 1914)
- Starling v. Hamner (Ark. 1932)
- Cheairs v. McDermott Motor Co. (Ark. 1928)
- A. H. Andrews Co. v. Delight Special School District (Ark. 1910)
- Briggs v. Steele (Ark. 1909)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In his motion for a new trial appellant does not complain of the instruction given by the court. The only ground for a new trial set out in his motion is, the verdict was contrary to law and evidence. All other errprs, if any, were waived, and the only question presented for our consideration is, was the verdict sustained by the evidence ? The answer is, it was. It is unsatisfactory; but as there was some evidence to sustain it, we cannot disturb it, but, on the contrary, affirm the judgment of the court below.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.