Hinkle v. Broadwater
Cases that cite this one
20 later published cases cite this decision.
- Muhammed v. Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct (Ark. 1987)
- Wakefield v. Wheeler (Ark. 1960)
- Page v. Page (Ark. 1946)
- Wheeler v. Wendleton (Ark. 1946)
- England v. Scott (Ark. 1942)
- White v. Turner (Ark. 1941)
- Curry v. McDaniel (Okla. 1912)
- King v. Crone (Ark. 1914)
- Hargett v. Hill, Fontaine & Co. (Ark. 1912)
- Leonard v. Leonard (Ark. 1912)
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Smith (Ark. 1912)
- Cunningham v. Toye (Ark. 1911)
- Roesch v. W. B. Worthen Co. (Ark. 1910)
- Cherry v. Brizzolara (Ark. 1909)
- Craig v. Craig (Ark. 1909)
- Bank of Pine Bluff v. Levi (Ark. 1909)
- Compagionette v. McArmick (Ark. 1909)
- Claypool v. Johnston (Ark. 1909)
- Johnson v. Elder (Ark. 1909)
- Lonoke v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. (Ark. 1909)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
(after stating the facts.) It could serve no useful purpose to go into a discussion of the facts. The question as to whether or not the deed was fraudulent is a question of fact. We have carefully considered the record on this point, and we conclude that the finding of the chancellor is correct. At least, we are convinced that it is not clearly against the preponderance of evidence. Gaty v. Holcomb, 44 Ark. 216; Brown. v. Wyandotte & S. E. Ry. Co., 68 Ark. 134; Mooney v. Tyler, 68 Ark. 314.
The land conveyed was the homestead. It could not have been reached by creditors, had there been no conveyance of it by the debtor, and he had the right to dispose of it as he pleased. Stanley v. Snyder, 43 Ark. 434; Blythe v. Jett, 52 Ark. 549. As to such property, there are no creditors. Then why should an intent to defraud them be predicated upon sqch an- act? We cannot see.
We need not discuss questions of law so ably presented in appellant’s brief. We agree with the chancellor on the facts.
Affirm.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.