Van Patten v. Wank
Van Patten v. Wank
82 Ark. 547; 102 S.W. 371; 1907 Ark. LEXIS 386
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hubbert v. Missouri Pacific Railroad (Ark. 1918)
- Baker v. Cazort (Ark. 1908)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The abstract of the appellant in this case is so deficient that the court is unable to ascertain the facts without exploring the record, which the oourt must decline' to do, as explained in Ruble v. Helm, 57 Ark. 304. See also applications to this rule in the following cases: Shorter University v. Franklin, 75 Ark. 571; Beavers v. Security Mutual Ins. Co., 76 Ark. 138.
For these reasons the judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.