Eddy Hotel Co. v. Ford
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Norden v. Devore (Ark. 1945)
- Poinsett Gin Company v. McCoy (Ark. 1943)
- American Railway Express Co. v. Hammock (Ark. 1922)
- Queen of Arkansas Insurance v. Public School District No. 44 (Ark. 1911)
- Diggs v. Diggs (Ark. 1910)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The appellant moved for a new trial on three grounds:
“First. Because the verdict was not according to law.
“Second. Because the verdict was not according to the evidence.
“Third. Because the verdict was contrary to the law and evidence.”
It is evident that the determination of the questions presented to us for decision depends upon the evidence adduced in the trial of this cause. With no aid or information except that furnished by the abstract of appellant we are unable to do so, the abstract containing a very small portion of the evidence.
Judgment is affirmed on account of the non-compliance with the rules of this court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.