Garrison v. State
Garrison v. State
257 Ark. 138; 515 S.W.2d 222; 1974 Ark. LEXIS 1325
Garrison v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant David Garrison’s sole contention for reversal of his two year conviction and sentence for possession of a controlled substance (LSD) is that the trial court should have excluded under the Fourth Amendment, as an illegal search, any evidence of the drugs that he voluntarily delivered to a confidential informant and an undercover narcotics agent. We find no merit in the contention. See Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206, 87 S. Ct. 424, 17 L. Ed. 312 (1966).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.