Marshall v. State
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ward v. McCord (Ark. Ct. App. 1997)
- Johnson & Johnson v. First National Bank (Ark. Ct. App. 1980)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appellant’s motion for consideration of the record on a prior appeal in this case is granted even though it is a useless motion. Rule 9 (d) of the rules of this court clearly provides: “On a second or subsequent appeal, the abstract shall include a condensation of all pertinent portions of the record filed on any prior appeal.”
The purpose of the entry of this order is to call the attention of the bar to the fact that such motions are unnecessary.
Printer’s Note: The opinion on consideration of this case appears in 265 Ark. 302, 578 S.W. 2d 32.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.