Tucker Enters., Inc. v. Hartje
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Tucker Enters., Inc. v. Hartje, 280 Ark. 164 (Ark. 1983)
655 S.W.2d 426; 1983 Ark. LEXIS 1463
Grant, Holt, Purtle
Tucker Enters., Inc. v. Hartje
Opinion of the Court
Respondent’s Petition to Correct Error is denied.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting. I do not think the Lovettes should be required to pay the costs in this petition for prohibition. They were incorrectly named as respondents and appeared only to try to extricate themselves from the proceeding. The petitioners were successful in prohibiting the judge from hearing the case on its merits. Since we do not require the trial court to pay the costs, although he lost the case, we should require the petitioners rather than innocent bystanders to pay the costs of this proceeding.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- TUCKER ENTERPRISES, INC. d/b/a MR. MOBILE HOMES and CENTURION HOMES CORPORATION v. George F. HARTJE, Judge
- Status
- Published