Herrington v. State
Herrington v. State
283 Ark. 231; 674 S.W.2d 505; 1984 Ark. LEXIS 1558
Herrington v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant, Michael Daniel Herrington, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Bruce D. Switzer, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.
We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5,1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.
A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.