Van Bibber v. Laster
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hooker v. Deere Credit Services, Inc. (Ark. Ct. App. 1998)
- Garland v. Windsor Door, National Union Fire Insurance (Ark. Ct. App. 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
On March 15,1984, at approximately 9 p.m., appellant, Thomas H. Van Bibber, was hit by appellee’s car while he was crossing the street. Dr. Van Bibber and his wife sued the appellee for injuries he suffered as a result of the accident. A jury verdict in favor of the appellee was returned, arid the appellants appeal pro se.
We must affirm this case because the appellants have failed to abstract any of the testimony or the pleadings which are essential for us to review their case. See Rule 9, Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals. The fact the appellants are pro se is immaterial. Bryant v. Lockhart, 288 Ark. 302, 705 S.W.2d 9 (1986).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.