Austin v. State
Austin v. State
309 Ark. 145; 825 S.W.2d 608; 1992 Ark. LEXIS 243; 1992 WL 71157
Austin v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant, Curtis Nathaniel Austin, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.
His attorney, Bill E. Ross, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.
We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to.the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.