Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1995

Martin v. City of Searcy

Martin v. City of Searcy
Supreme Court of Arkansas · Decided November 20, 1995
322 Ark. 562; 909 S.W.2d 652; 1995 Ark. LEXIS 674
Martin v. City of Searcy

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Appellant Johnny Martin, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Robert Meurer, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.