Hutts v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Hutts v. State, 341 Ark. 891 (Ark. 2000)
20 S.W.3d 412; 2000 Ark. LEXIS 366
Hutts v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant James Hutts, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, John C. ■ Riedel, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.
We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).
The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- James HUTTS v. STATE of Arkansas
- Status
- Published