Hainline v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Hainline v. State, 342 Ark. 5 (Ark. 2000)
25 S.W.3d 413; 2000 Ark. LEXIS 379; 2000 WL 1281215

Hainline v. State

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Daniel Milburn Hainline, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Boyce R. Davis, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Reference

Full Case Name
Daniel Milburn HAINLINE v. STATE of Arkansas
Status
Published