Hainline v. State
Hainline v. State
342 Ark. 5; 25 S.W.3d 413; 2000 Ark. LEXIS 379; 2000 WL 1281215
Hainline v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant, Daniel Milburn Hainline, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Boyce R. Davis, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.
We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).
The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.