Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000

Proctor v. State

Proctor v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas · Decided September 7, 2000
342 Ark. 8; 25 S.W.3d 413; 2000 Ark. LEXIS 377

Proctor v. State

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Julian Robert Proctor, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, William C. McArthur, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.