McKenzie v. State
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Valenzuela v. State (Ark. 2004)
- McKenzie v. State (Ark. 2004)
- Valenzuela v. State (Ark. 2004)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The procedural background of this matter is set out in McKenzie v. State, 355 Ark. 259, 134 S.W.3d. 5 (2003) (per curiam). Mr. Charles E. Waldman appeared before this court on January 15, 2004, to show cause why he should not be held in civil contempt for failing to comply with the terms of our previous per curiam orders. Mr. Waldman, represented by Mr. JefFRosenzweig, denied that he should be held in contempt for noncompliance with our orders.
Given the circumstances of this case, we hereby appoint a special master, The Honorable John Cole, to conduct a hearing on the matter. Upon receipt of the master’s findings, we will render a decision on the matter.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.