City of Dover v. City of Russellville

Supreme Court of Arkansas
City of Dover v. City of Russellville, 213 S.W.3d 1 (Ark. 2005)
363 Ark. 248
Per Curiam

City of Dover v. City of Russellville

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The City of Dover appeals from a judgment entered June 29, 2004, β€œand from all orders entered prior to that date.” However, in violation of Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a)(8), the notice of appeal is not included in the Addendum. Pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3), this court finds that the Addendum is deficient, and the appellant is granted fifteen days from the date of the entry of this order within which to file an amended Addendum. It is a practical impossibility for seven justices to examine a single transcript filed with this court. Villines v. Harris, 361 Ark. 111, 204 S.W.3d 520 (2005). Further, this court may affirm the judgment under Ark. R. Sup. Ct. 4-2(b)(3) if an amended Addendum is not filed within the fifteen days.

Reference

Full Case Name
CITY of DOVER, Arkansas; Johnny Waldo, Mayor v. CITY of RUSSELLVILLE, Arkansas
Status
Published