Nance v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Nance v. State, 364 Ark. 271 (Ark. 2005)
217 S.W.3d 850
Glaze

Nance v. State

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The application for permission to appear as counsel on behalf of petitioner, Eric Randall Nance, is denied. In the alternative, even if we were to grant the application, the motion for stay of execution is denied.

Concurring Opinion

Tom Glaze, Justice,

concuning. I would deny the motion for application of permission to appear as counsel, but alternatively concur with the court’s decision to deny the motion for stay of execution for the reasons set forth by the State in its brief in response to the motion for stay of execution.

Reference

Full Case Name
Eric Randall NANCE v. STATE of Arkansas
Status
Published