Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2005

Nance v. State

Nance v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas · Decided November 28, 2005 · Glaze
364 Ark. 271; 217 S.W.3d 850

Nance v. State

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The application for permission to appear as counsel on behalf of petitioner, Eric Randall Nance, is denied. In the alternative, even if we were to grant the application, the motion for stay of execution is denied.

Concurring Opinion

Tom Glaze, Justice,

concuning. I would deny the motion for application of permission to appear as counsel, but alternatively concur with the court’s decision to deny the motion for stay of execution for the reasons set forth by the State in its brief in response to the motion for stay of execution.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.