Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2009

White v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

White v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Supreme Court of Arkansas · Decided April 2, 2009 · Per Curiam
300 S.W.3d 499; 2009 Ark. 173; 2009 Ark. LEXIS 225 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

White v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

Opinion

MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK

PER CURIAM.

Natasha White, by and through her attorney Jesse L. Kearney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk to accept the record and permission to file a belated brief. Attorney Kearney states in the motion that he is at fault for failing to perfect the appeal.

We now entertain motions for rule on clerk in appeals from termination of parental rights. See Moore v. Arkansas Dep’t of Human Servs., 363 Ark. 205, 212 S.W.3d 1 (2005). We afford indigent parents in termination of parental rights actions similar protections afforded indigent criminal defendants. Latiolais v. Arkansas Dep’t of Human Servs., 368 Ark. 381, 382, 246 S.W.3d 413 (2006). As attorney Kearney has admitted fault, we grant the motion for rule on clerk. See Moore, supra; McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Arkansas Supreme Court committee on Professional Conduct.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.